Arbitration has become an increasingly popular method of dispute resolution in commercial contracts, often included as a standard clause in agreements between businesses. Companies across industries, from construction to finance, have turned to arbitration to avoid the costs, delays, and unpredictability of litigation. However, while arbitration offers significant benefits, it also carries potential downsides that can impact both parties.

The Benefits of Arbitration for Commercial Disputes
One of the key reasons businesses choose arbitration is its efficiency. Unlike litigation, which can drag on for years due to court backlogs, procedural rules, and appeals, arbitration tends to be faster. Arbitration hearings can usually be scheduled sooner than court trials, and decisions, known as “awards,” are typically issued promptly after the hearing concludes. This time-saving factor can be critical in commercial settings where time is money, and prolonged disputes could harm business operations.
Cost is another significant advantage. While arbitration is not always cheaper than litigation, particularly in complex cases with multiple arbitrators or extensive proceedings, it often involves fewer procedural steps. Discovery, the pretrial process of gathering evidence, is typically limited, and the hearings are more streamlined. This reduction in procedural complexity can translate into savings on legal fees, particularly for parties with substantial litigation budgets.
Confidentiality is another key benefit in arbitration. For businesses involved in sensitive matters, such as intellectual property disputes, internal management issues, or competitive commercial practices, arbitration’s private nature can be invaluable. Arbitration hearings and awards are not typically made public, unlike court decisions, which are part of the public record. This privacy allows companies to resolve disputes without exposing proprietary information or risking reputational damage.
Additionally, arbitration offers flexibility that is not available in court litigation. Parties in arbitration have a say in the rules of the process, such as selecting arbitrators with specific expertise in the commercial issue at hand, deciding on the governing law, and agreeing on procedural matters. This level of control can help tailor the arbitration process to the specific needs of the dispute.

The Criticisms of Arbitration in the Commercial Context
Despite its benefits, arbitration also has drawbacks, especially when considering the balance of power between commercial parties. One of the most significant criticisms is the lack of transparency. While confidentiality can be a benefit in certain cases, it can also prevent the development of consistent legal precedents and allow for potentially unfair decisions to be hidden from scrutiny. In cases involving larger, repeat players—such as corporations with substantial resources—arbitration decisions may disproportionately favor the party with more experience navigating the process as well as repeat players who take advantage of the informational asymmetry involving cases against multiple parties who cannot see the claims, issues, and outcomes available in the public records of similar cases.
The finality of arbitration awards can be another concern. Arbitration decisions are generally binding and not subject to appeal, except on very narrow grounds, such as fraud or serious procedural misconduct. While this is intended to ensure efficiency, it can also lead to situations where an incorrect legal or factual conclusion cannot be challenged. In litigation, parties have the right to appeal to higher courts if they believe the decision was wrong, but arbitration provides far less opportunity for recourse.
Another very real issue is cost unpredictability. While arbitration is often seen as cheaper than litigation, it can still become expensive. Arbitrators, especially in complex commercial disputes, command high fees, and the lack of procedural safeguards like fee waivers or cost-sharing mechanisms can place a financial burden on smaller parties, an issue that is particularly difficult for smaller business entities that are facing opponents with greater resources. Additionally, arbitration often involves administrative fees paid to institutions like the American Arbitration Association (AAA) or the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), adding further costs to the use of arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism.

Conclusion
In the commercial setting, arbitration offers many advantages, particularly in terms of speed, confidentiality, and flexibility. However, these benefits come with trade-offs, including concerns about fairness, lack of transparency, and the finality of awards. Businesses must carefully consider whether arbitration clauses should be included in their contracts and whether the advantages outweigh the risks in each commercial relationship. Understanding the potential benefits and drawbacks in advance of agreeing to any arbitration agreement will help businesses make informed decisions when structuring their dispute resolution processes.

Next Steps for Businesses
If you have an issue related to arbitration, arbitration clauses contained in an agreement, or any questions about contract terms or other aspects of dispute resolution contact Possinger Law Group.
= = = = =
About Possinger Law Group, PLLC
Founded in 2001, Possinger Law Group is a boutique law firm dedicated to elite levels of service to small and medium-sized businesses and the individuals that own them. When faced with serious problems, clients have reached out to Possinger Law Group to be a trusted advisor and advocate to be a guide through high conflict situations and complex legal challenges. In litigation matters, Possinger Law Group works with its clients to effectively resolve disputes, and when necessary, by being fiercely aggressive in litigation.

Editor’s Note: This blog post, as well as any data and information provided are for informational purposes only. and is not intended to constitute legal advice and may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information. Readers of this article should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or refrain from acting based on information on this article without first seeking legal advice from counsel in the relevant jurisdiction.